GovernanceThought leadership / leaked approval matrixRisk & Regulation
Firm Pledges Unwavering Support for Rule of Law, Pending Client Approval
The profession's principles are non-negotiable, subject to a confidential list of people authorised to negotiate them.
By Martin Pavey · · 2 min read

OPINION | The difficult work of having a principle
A law firm has drafted a statement pledging unwavering support for the rule of law, then circulated it to relationship partners to check whether any client might prefer it to waver.
The statement follows an industry appeal asking lawyers to defend institutions and professional independence even when inconvenient. Its first draft said that those obligations were not optional. The current draft says that those obligations are central to an ongoing stakeholder dialogue.
There is a difference, partners insist, between abandoning a principle and considering how the principle might be received by a strategically important client.
An internal approval matrix obtained by The Unbillable offers guidance:
| Proposed public position | Required approval |
|---|---|
| Rule of law is important | Communications |
| Courts should be independent | Risk and Communications |
| These principles apply to our clients | Relevant relationship partner |
| These principles apply to a particularly profitable client | Executive committee, after year-end |
The firm's ethics partner says professional independence cannot mean asking permission before applying professional standards. The head of commercial relationships agrees in principle but says the phrase before applying could create unnecessary pressure on the process.
One junior lawyer asked whether the firm would refuse a client instruction that crossed a clear line. She was directed to the escalation policy, which in turn directed her to the partner responsible for the client. The partner requested discretion in the handling of hypothetical scenarios.
The managing partner says the firm is completely committed to values-led leadership. He has asked staff not to mistake the time taken to express those values for any uncertainty about them.
The latest draft describes the firm as “unequivocal in our support for robust consideration of the core principles underpinning the legal order”. Every reviewer has approved it. Nobody can identify an action it obliges the firm to take.
The ethics partner has suggested replacing the public statement with a clear list of things the firm will and will not do. That proposal has been referred for further consultation because, unlike a statement, it might affect a real decision.
Something worth not billing for.
Get The Unbillable every week.
Appears in The Brief, Issue 006
Related stories

Investigations · Investigative report
Partner’s Avatar Found Harassing Female Staff; Partner Appointed to Lead Its Retraining
An audit finds Hugo Tolliver wrote the instructions and approved the messages, prompting Hargreaves Crake to take decisive action against his software.
By Celia Firth, Partnership Correspondent13 Oct 2026 · 3 min read
Re: Internal Documents
Task Force Formed to Review Previous Task Force
Minutes of the Wetherby Dodd Committee Effectiveness Task Force. Approved, subject to approval.
From the Wetherby Dodd intranet28 Sep 2026 · 2 min read
Re: Governance
Firm Launches BULLETPROOF Transparency Programme; Clients Cannot See Through It
Bellwether Voss achieves full disclosure by approving only information it has already decided to disclose.
By The Unbillable24 Sep 2026 · 3 min read

